Home  |  Links   |  Contact Us   |  Bookmark
   Travel Forum Search :
     News        Travel Topics        Travel Forum       Travel Directories        Dictionary  
Travel Forum    Africa & Middle East
Travel Discussion Forum

 What is one sentence you never wanna hear/;-)/?

Additional Details
@Tribal Angel: Yeah...that does hurt, doesnt it?;-)...


 I would like to be wrong but I need to ask about it, has Israel really used nuclear blackmail against the US?
I have heard they threatened to use nuclear weapons against Muslim countries to force the US to help them at certain points in history.

Is this true?

I am shocked if it is, ...


 Is egypt part of africa?
...


 A puppet on the string?
If there ever should be a two state solution, will Palestine then be able to have an army? Will this army be allowed to be supported?

If there ever should be a peace agreement and if P...


 Aliens........?
are they really smarter than humans?......


 Egyptian muslim ladies?
what do you use to wear?
lebs daye2 zy kol el banat?wla lebs wase3 fedfad dont describe your body?do you wear your hijab in the wright way?or you just cover you hair coz it looks bad and you ...


 Why is Lebanon soo poor?

Additional Details
hey, i want to apologize to anyone who took this question offensively, i was only asking for the reasons why it was poor, i didnt mean anything else by it....


 What would happen if a chinese man did that to you?????
A European walks in a Chinese restaurant and says
"A large Coke." The Chinese dude gives him one. He takes a swallow and spits it back out.
The European asks, "What was ...


 Hey, Egyptian guys?
what do you think of this?! Girls are free to state their opinion too of course!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi Details
Sorry ...


 Who was your hero when you were a child?
I used to love Sindibad...dunno if any of you remember that cartoon...it was dubbed in arabic...and I loved him and his ...


 What do you think about that picture?
http://www.informationli
Israeli children sent a "gift of love" for the Lebanese children during 7arb Tamoz / July War 2006.
A...


 What do i wear in morroco?
i'm in my late twenties and a woman and like clothes, but all the summer clothes in topshop et al seem a bit revealing for marrakech....

what should i wear? (i'm going there in 4 ...


 What do you think causes the anti-Zionist extremist mentality?
Islamic fundamentalism, racism, poverty, corrupt governments, the lack of a Palestinian homeland, etc....


 Just out of curiosity if Islam bans wine and whisky, why some Muslims drink them?
(seen it with my own eyes, not that I am judging, just curious)...


 Favourite smells in your adopted country ?
What are your favourite smells in the city where you have moved to ? Here in Bremen, Germany, there are some really pleasant smells that the wind brings to my nose.

1. The lovely M...


 How does this make you feel? What do you think?
As everybody knows some Arab countries have sanctions for Israels goods and travel restrictions for Israeli citizen. One country with the hardest rules regarding this is KSA.

How does it ...


 Jews working on shabbat?
My hotel in tel aviv is kosher, but is still open on shabbat. why is that not unkosher?
also, the workers are clearly Jewish, but they are working on shbbat, so how can they call it kosher?
<...


 What is one thing one should never do in Saudi Arabia?

Additional Details
iceman: You mean lamb chops? I am vegan;-P...


 Why does virtually the whole international community say the West Bank is occupied territory?

Additional Details
The UN Security Council
the UN General Assembly
the International Court
the International Committee of the Red Cross

all say the West Bank ...


 What's your ...?
greatest strength and your greatest weakness?...



Proud white american

Do you think Apartheid in South Africa was something right to do?


    



Show all answers


Diezel
An average person who is well aware of the definition of a word 'apartheid' would not even attempt to ask this question. On the other hand your screen-name brings an understanding as to why the answer to your own question is not obvious to you. I'll give you a clear picture of what apartheid was like in South Africa, and surely after reading you'll be able to make your own judgement.

Apartheid (literally "apartness" in Afrikaans and Dutch) was a system of racial segregation that was enforced in South Africa from 1948 to 1994. Under apartheid, people were legally classified into a racial groups - the main ones being White, Black, Indian and Coloured - and were geographically, and forcibly, separated from each other on the basis of the legal classification. The Black majority, in particular, legally became citizens of particular "homelands" that were nominally sovereign nations but operated more akin to United States "Indian Reservations" and Australian "Aboriginal Reserves." In reality, a majority of Black South Africans had never resided in these "homelands."

In practice, this prevented non-white people — even if actually resident in white South Africa — from having a vote or influence, restricting their rights to faraway homelands which they may never have visited. Education, medical care, and other public services were sometimes claimed to be separate but equal, but those available to non-white people were in fact vastly inferior.

Apartheid was implemented by the law. The following restrictions were not only social but were strictly enforced by law (the Reservation of Separate Amenities Act specifically allowed government to provide different levels of amenities for the different races):
* Non-whites were not allowed to run businesses or professional practices in those areas designated as 'white South Africa' without a permit. They were supposed to move to the black homelands and set up businesses and practices there.
* Transport and civil facilities were segregated.
* Blacks were excluded from living or working in white areas, unless they had a pass - nicknamed the 'dompas' ('stupid pass' in Afrikaans). Only blacks with "Section 10" rights (those who had migrated to the cities before World War II) were excluded from this provision.
* A pass was only issued to a black person with approved work. Spouses and children had to be left behind in non-white areas. Many white households employed blacks as domestic workers, who were allowed to live on the premises— often in small rooms external to the family home.
* A pass was issued for one magisterial district confining the holder to that area only.
* Being without a valid pass made a person subject to immediate arrest and summary trial, often followed by deportation to the person's homeland. Police vans patrolled the "white" areas to round up the "illegal" blacks. In practice this was sporadic because of the vast number of blacks resident in tiny "boyslines" or staff quarters at white properties.

* Black areas rarely had plumbing or electricity.
* Hospitals and ambulances were segregated: the white hospitals were generally of a very good standard with well-educated staff and ample funds, while black hospitals were understaffed and underfunded.

* In the 1970s each black child's education cost the state only a tenth of each white child's. The Bantu Education Act specifically aimed to teach blacks only the basic skills they would need in working for whites. Higher education was provided in separate universities and colleges after 1959.

* Trains and buses were segregated. Black buses, known as "green" buses because they had a green marker on the front windscreen, stopped at black bus stops and white buses at white ones.

* Public beaches were racially segregated, with the best ones reserved for whites.
* Public swimming pools and libraries were also segregated. There were few black pools or libraries.
* Sex and marriage between the races was prohibited.
* A white driver was not allowed to have a black in the front of the car if that person was of a different sex.

* Cinemas in white areas were not allowed to admit blacks.
* Most restaurants and hotels in white areas were not allowed to admit blacks, unless the government had given prior permission.

* Black Africans were prohibited from attending "white" churches under the Churches Native Laws Amendment Act (1957). This was never rigidly enforced, and churches were one of the few places races could mix without the interference of the law.

* Although trade unions for black and "coloured" (mixed race) workers had existed since the early 20th century, it was not until the 1980s reforms that trade unions for black workers were recognized by the government.
* The minimum yearly taxable income for blacks was 360 Rand (30 Rand a month), while the white threshold was much higher, at 750 Rand (62.5 Rand per month).

Apartheid pervaded South African culture, as well as the law. The perception of non-white South Africans as second-class citizens was reinforced in many media, and the lack of opportunities for the races to mix in a social setting entrenched social distance between people.
* Ambulances, bridges, drive-in cinema parking spaces, graveyards, maternity wards, parks, pedestrian crossings, public toilets, taxis and theatres were also segregated.

* During the 1960s, 1970s and early 1980s, the government implemented a policy of 'resettlement', to force people to move to their designated 'group areas'. Some argue that over three and a half million people were forced to resettle during this period. The victims of these removals included:
•Labour tenants on white-owned farms
•The inhabitants of the so-called 'black spots', areas of African-owned land surrounded by white farms
•The families of workers living in townships close to the homelands
•'Surplus people' from urban areas, including thousands of people from the Western Cape (which was declared a 'Coloured Labour Preference Area') who were moved to the Transkei and Ciskei homelands.

The best-publicized forced removals of the 1950s occurred in Johannesburg, when 60,000 people were moved to the new township of Soweto (an acronym for South Western Townships).
Until 1955, Sophiatown had been one of the few urban areas where blacks were allowed to own land, and was slowly developing into an entirely multiracial settlement. As industry in Johannesburg grew, Sophiatown became the home of a rapidly expanding black workforce, as it was convenient and close to town. It could also boast the only swimming pool for Black children in Johannesburg. It was however one of the oldest black settlements in Johannesburg, and held an almost symbolic importance for the 50,000 blacks it contained, both in terms of its sheer vibrancy and its unique culture. Despite a vigorous ANC protest campaign and worldwide publicity, the removal of Sophiatown began on 9 February 1955 under the Western Areas Removal Scheme. In the early hours, heavily armed police entered Sophiatown to force residents out of their homes and load their belongings onto government trucks. The residents were taken to a large tract of land, thirteen miles from the city centre, known as Meadowlands (now part of Soweto), that the government had purchased in 1953. Sophiatown was destroyed by bulldozers, and a new white suburb named Triomf (Triumph) was built in its place. This pattern of forced removal and destruction was to repeat itself over the next few years, and was not limited to people of African descent. Forced removals from areas like Cato Manor (Mkhumbane) in Durban, and District Six in Cape Town, where 55,000 coloured and Indian people were forced to move to new townships on the Cape Flats, were carried out under the Group Areas Act of 1950.


oklatom
Rating
Apartheid, an Afrikaans words meaning separate. Apartheid, social and political policy of racial segregation and discrimination enforced by white minority governments in South Africa from 1948 to 1994.

It took a class of humans and made them sub-human. No, it was not right.

What will your next question be? Perhaps "Was Hitler right in killing the Jews?"


Millie
of course not


ElOsoBravo
DUH................................ stupid.


bugboy
Rating
I think that you will find the overwhelming general opinion will, of course, be no! It would be surprising to find any other type of response - apart from random abuse - to a question which asks whether or not we believe one of the most racially intollerant and opressing regimes of all time was correct.

It is however obvious from your username that you might not agree with the consensus and so I would be interested to know why it is that you think it was the right thing to do. Having grown up in South Africa during apartheid and having first hand understanding of it I would be interested for you to post an informed argument here supporting your views.


Gina C
Ok what the hell is up with u?


rabbit
It was bad, but so much good also came out of it. It forced the then South African government to build massive industries to manufacture our own good because we could not buy them on the open market. Examples are Sasol, Yskor, Denel, The mining Houses, etc


Mom
No ,of course it wasn't. The trouble they are having now was caused by not educating the black population.


letem haveit
Rating
Are you a fecking simpleton?


aflumpire
What is wrong with you gay butthead? I have had a look at your questions and YOU DISCUST ME YOU NUTT!!!!!!!!!!


poepies
Yeah, only a STUPID PROUD WHITE AMERICAN could ask a STUPID DUMB A*SS QUESTION like that!!!!!!

The answer is no!!!! And what do you Americans even know about Apartheid. I can write a book on ALL THE NONSENSE PEOPLE THINK AND TALK REGARDING APARTHEID!!!!!

You should know better, seen as you Americans know EVERYTHING!


Emma-Leigh
Rating
God bless you. U need it.


dehrt s
Rating
South Africa is a hole as is the rest of the country. Why do you think the blacks won't go back there? Even they don't like the conditions.


Shossi
I do know that I would have never foot there when it did have Apartheid.


Miss Vira
thank you letem haveit. enough said.


liefie
No,it wasn't but they didn't need to empower a black presedent.
Hurting people can never be right!


Brad Morris
Rating
Are you on crack?
I grew up in South Africa under all that.
I saw black people subjected to the most dehumanizing treatment - literally treated as if they were a sub-human species - for no other reason than the color of their skin.

The fact that you pose this question is proof that such attitudes still exist.



Rating



 Enter Your Message or Comment


User Name:  
User Email:   
Post a comment:









  
Terms of Service   |   Privacy Policy
© 2011 TravelExpertGuide                 



0.254
CATEGORIES   ARCHIVE   TRAVEL
 HOME Forum Links
 NEWS Forum1 Links1
 FORUM Forum2 Links2
 DICTIONARY  All RSS Feeds