
The angels have the Arc Light.
 |
Why not a previously remote location in the Mid East? During the Ottoman Empire (1299-1922), Israel was a sparsely populated backwater -- undeveloped and beyond remote.
As for Africa, much of that is Islamic as well. So you'll have the same problems.
Like most people who have partial knowledge of the history, you appear to accept that the problem is entirely about displacement. That's not the case in the least. It's about Muslim refusal to have what they see as an infidel state in their midst. They consider the land to be a waqf, an endowment for their benefit, and theirs alone, for all time.
Israel, on the other hand, is willing to share. Some 20% of its population are Arabic, including members of the Knesset. |
|

paul v
|
It would be trouble as no part of Africa is actually inhabited. They inevitably would have to take somebodys land, the problem would be the same as with the palestinians |
|

Sαмsooмα {ραℒєς†îиîαи ✌ }
 |
Moved to a remote location in africa, gee man how can you move a chunk of land that big. |
|

* Habseligkeiten
 |
Now, why would we do that to the Africans? They will get all their land occupied and their children murdered. Dear G-d, no. Put them..idk..somewhere they can't hurt anyone. |
|

The Truth
 |
So much BS is here there was never something called israel, and there will never be.
LOL @ some comments! |
|

AlphaFactor
 |
Actually, the original Zionist architects of Israel were seriously considering something like that.
The candidate regions for a new Jewish homeland included the Rhineland, present-day Israel, Argentina, and Uganda.
Now then...
Even in spite of the shred novelty that underpins your 'Final Solution'...
I think we'll just get back to working with the region's residents to find some way to purge the area of violence, poverty, and war.
A few remarks on the Uganda idea below. |
|

príчα
 |
LOL!! Oh my gosh, this question made me laugh. Haha. Thank you!
Please, get them moved anywhere but I honestly suggest that they're given a state in America. People love them there so much, they'll be welcomed and wouldnt mind.
As long as Israelis dont stay where they dont belong and arent welcome, I dont care! But of course the nice ones that are not Zionist can stay : ) |
|

ncherefnyc
 |
No. Leave the Africans in peace. Put the jews in Africa & they will try to take over that continent too! Greedy........... |
|

Duane
|
Ethiopia is actually their ancestral homeland as all archeological evidence suggests; Hebrew artifacts there are of much greater antiquity than anything found in Palestine. The "Israeli" government has an excellent relationship with Ethiopia so I shouldn't think Jewish migration to their true Ancestral Homeland would be a problem; the present Ethiopian government is cash-starved and would certainly welcome the capital investment that would surely follow,what to speak of truly massive U.S. aid. |
|

G. #2
|
No, to Antarctica better. Or to Texas. |
|

Betty B
|
Why Africa?
I think they are more remote locations in Australia because I never hear about those.
Oh!!! What about Haiti?
I think everybody would benefit from this. |
|

Crystal (PSM)
 |
I would hate to do that to the wonderful people of Africa. I agree with Betty. Australia yay. |
|

jd
 |
They moved them to the remotest area they could find in 48. If you could move them and you can't then they would flourish again and the African Muslims would be after their land.
God said they would never lose the land again.
Live with it. |
|

Levon the Man
|
I say we give them Chicago. Maybe they can clean the place up. |
|

Teez
 |
No, because Jews are horrible at basketball. And black people never have any money so Jews cant build banks there.
stereotypes = fun |
|

Edg1
 |
No. They should have ALL of Israel to themselves. The "Palestinians" are the ones that should be moved.Maybe to Syria or Jordan or even Egypt. |
|

Lupines supports GEERT WILDERS
|
No, there are greater tasks to perform, like moving Iceland down to Antarctica to replace the melting Wilkins ice shelf. |
|

My point exactly
|
no they will probably invade all of africa and kill all the vulnerable and sick people. |
|

The First Dragon
 |
As long as they can take the Temple Mount and an impenetrable barrier.
LOL Israel's enemies will never agree to the impenetrable barrier. |
|

Steel Rain
|
No |
|

Beautiful Sunset
 |
Bad idea.
They will create the same problems again. War Crimes etc.
It is best for them to start listening to Western Culture people and learn about democracy, toilets inside the house, cars instead of pulling animals and lots of other modern habits.
That way not only we are going to make them better people and crush anti-semitism, but also we will crush the Nazi theory that created so many dead Palestinian children and so many elderly and helpless Arab people dead in only 60 years.
If only Mr. Obama would agree no to interfere with us we could make the Jews a race to look up not send half the population to the Hague War Crime tribunal.
bye bye |
|

Tyreeisme!
|
no! Jews have a right to a homeland in their own area of origin!!!!!! |
|

Wise Heart
 |
If someone carries another passport, can go back to the original country. Then USA and England can take some as both sides would be happy the 2 governments and people who are going to relocate there. Russia is able also to take the few who were sent in the last years.
I think it will be suitable also to ask other Jews of the world about their opinion
http://www.nkusa.org/ |
|

Aussie
 |
Why ...what have the Africans done that they deserve THAT ! No ...leave them where they are & keep trying to civilise them ! |
|

diya
 |
why africa??!
I'll tell you something. africans are really sick of always getting ttrash from all over the world!! We empathize with palestinians but please...if you wanna relocate the Zionist state, I think antartica would be just perfect... |
|

Warren S
|
This seems to mirror the plan by Hitler before he commenced the Holocaust. I ask the person who asked this question to reflect on how awful it is. No, Israel should not be moved. It is where it should be.
Edit: To Beautiful Sunset. No. Norway has a lot to answer for. They are not the good guys. Does the name Quisling mean anything?! |
|

Teresa (SFECU) -†- pray4revival
|
I have a better idea. Since you're obviously another Hitler wanna-be...why don't you move to the new Nazi stronghold known as Arabia and settle in for the long haul? Because Israel won't be uprooted and led to slaughter again. |
|

porquemoi
|
No. Muslims would go there and start up the same terrorist crap they are doing now. The problem is that islamofascists want to kill every Israeli no matter where they are, and people so full of hate cannot be compromised with.
And then there is the issue of God saying Israel is where it is... |
|

sweetpea
|
No. God promised them the land they are on, plus a little more. It's the same land they had thousands of years ago. That would be a disgrace to God and to Israel. |
|

Arieh
 |
Israel is a soverign nation just like any other. Why should they be moved? On the other hand, the Palestinians are not, so why shouldn't they be moved to Jordan and Egypt respectively? |
|

larry_lime
 |
The State of Israel is WHERE G-D PUT IT! |
|

 |
|
|

| |
|