Why have afrikaners become so liberal and weak ??????????

Show all answers

Bull III

It seems to be world wide phenomenon at present if you take a close look at trends in Europe, they have allowed mongrel muslims and Africans to plunder their countries and immigrate to levels where Europe will become the new "Africa" in another 50 years. Look at all the "gay rights" and "women's lib" nonsense going on there, the legalising of drugs and prostitution. Ultra liberalism will be their downfall. The UK has already become a mongrel nation and the rest of Europe is not far behind.
I agree that the Afrikaner has little choice but to be passive after the back stabbing jackal De Klerk sold his people out and the country along with them.
At current emigration rates, there will not be an Afrikaner nation/race in 20 years and if there still is, it will be an extremely insignificant minority.

JOE DIRT

Firstly, I feel that you are generalising slightly friend.

Secondly, the Afrikaner nation has NEVER been "weak" and our REAL history supports this. In my own opinion and regarding my own experiences, the Afrikaner is slowly but surely regaining his pride and a new found will to co- exist peacefully with everyone around him, even though our people are falling victim to the most sadistic and blatantly racist crimes, both publically and politcally.

We are a people with pride, love and forgiveness to spare. A pitty though, that some are so stuck in their ignorant and blind ways, that this country is losing hundreds of experienced, unbiased and hard working Afrikaans people every day.

london.oval

In my experience there have always been liberal Afrikaaners just as there are verkrampted and liberal English speakers - and don't take passive for weak.

There might not be anything happening at the moment but this group of people is far, far, far from weak.

Flying Fid

So being liberal is to be weak is it? Presumably you would say that to be strong it to be a warmonger, someone who has only hate in their hearts and an authoritarian bully?
I would consider that to be weak, to be a bully is to be a coward, to rely on violence is the mask of a moral cripple and an imbecile. Just like the murderous apartheid SA government post 1948, terrified of democracy and the other. Sad people, good riddance to them.

rebel

dunno,im real disappointed,mr mandela was an anc terrorist,i would have fought for s.a,tried to join their army but was too old,whites made that country.

SAgirl

Im an afrikaner and let me tell you something never in your life under estimate the afrikaner because that is the time when they are at their most dangerous.

General Proud

judging by your question, i take it you're a boere boytjie.

the whole "boer supremacy" thing is a thing of the past.

it's the big wheel of power, one day on top, the next day at the bottom.

everyone gets a turn at the top, and i suppose sooner or later, some boertjie will get back into power.

until then, let's just all stick to slagging our chief dipsomaniac, iron liver mbeki.

bryte

This is your personal opinion and not a proven fact.All white south africans have been disenfranchised and now suffer under reverse discrimination even those born after 1994 who had nothing to do with apartheid.

Jewel

Your view may not be fact.

Perhaps your statement that they have become so liberal and weak is purely a generalisation or just a matter of opinion.

Brad Morris 8

What choice do they have? They're outnumbered and have no other choice but to fit in with the majority.

To Cybercom - liberals are authoritarian bullies - they crush all dissent of their myopic agenda.
Where are the liberals that got rid of the 'murderous apartheid' government, now that the genocidal ANC has picked up their mantle, and then some?

Stef Elke

Maybe they don't want to fight! The black population is much bigger than the white so would you start a war!!!

jack daniels

Never weak but have lost their way a bit, everything in life goes a full circle, the next generation will close the circle once again.

Ranjeeh D

They don't have a lot of choice these days. They are probably more concerned with the robbings, rapes and murders that are widespread throughout this now near lawless but "liberated" country.

First, you are talking (or is it posting) nonsense. Blacks were not oppressed because of your socalled terrorism. Maybe you should clean your brains and make sense before you post trash here. For your uniformed sand you call brains, the arm struggle only started after the banning of the liberation movement. The bannings were not in response to any acts of terrorism, but a response by oppressive government to peaceful insistence by the natives of the land that the land be shared by all who live in it. So, you must stop pretending that you know much about the history of this country!!!!

I'm not even going to anser your original question as it's clear that you have weird ideas!

sins

Honestly! To open your head for new ideas, to admit that yes, there were mistakes in the past. And to know the only way to succeed is going forward, not backwards. To re examine everything you've been taught, making your own mind up for the better. You call that weak? Being liberal does not equal weak. In fact, just the opposite.

The fact that not much is being done about crime is not about weakness, it's not knowing where to go and what to do. Neither is it a "white" problem, so I presume that is not what you were referring to.

gav

The fact that they have finally decided to give some power to the vast number of black south Africans they oppressed for centuries isn't a sign of weakness. It's really just the cessation of a crime against humanity.
Do you think they should have continued the beatings, torture and imprisonment without trial ?

Enter Your Message or Comment

User Name:
User Email:
Post a comment: