yogazen
|
one long non-stop
preferably NOT by a fatass who takes up half of my seat and chats the whole flight |
|
reddemonwi55
 |
One long non-stop, window seat and a good book or a long nap..when you have a window seat yo don't have people walking over you all the time. |
|
zaraza
 |
Buffy... he he.........................................
um, it depends on the duration of the flight. i have enough time usually when i travel... so i use always layovers. it gives me some break in between, to walk, to smoke a cigarette, have some snack or small shopping, to refresh myself. twice I've spent one day in Istanbul, in a very nice 4* hotel(inclusive)... had a nice trip trough the city, saw many beautiful things... for free.
i like layovers... |
|
?
|
non stop no doubt....because the more times u get on and off of planes, it seems to increase the chances of the airlines losing your luggage. Also most plane crashes occur during landings and take offs. So decreases your odds of this occuring as well. |
|
Lune
|
one long geting-over-it flight ^_^ |
|
Lilly K
 |
long non stop. |
|
sukhwinder b
 |
Break it up,as long non stop flight has it's own health hazards like venous thrombosis ,embolism &so on. |
|
Nat
 |
non-stop for sure! |
|
Em
|
Long non-stop, bad things happen to people layover flights. You'll miss one or one will be delayed and it will throw it all off! |
|
rmoller69
|
long nonstop, because you can sleep your way true, or watch movie and stuff like that, if it is broken up you will have to leave in the middle of your sleep or movie |
|
rizwano
 |
1 long, non stop flight is better. time is not waisted |
|
basketcase88
|
1 long, non stop flight any day. The worst part is taking off and landing. |
|
amber
|
A long, non-stop flight, making the journey not lengthy and having few chances of the luggages being misplaced.Just arriving in the destination in on go! |
|
Velociraptor
|
the sooner it's over the better |
|
polish_cutie5698
|
yes!! a plane with a lot of stops is way too tiring, because then you usually have to wait at the airport for a long time. |
|
chariot804
|
layovers tend to add onto the trip and seem to take forever.
non-stop is the way to go! |
|
prat_sadhu9
|
nay.. non-stop flight puts u in danger as u dont move much, this has a great impact on ur health. sitting continuously for hours on a long journey effects one's health |
|
USC Fan
|
long, non-stop flight without a doubt! |
|
IWIU
|
break it up and get some pretty flight attendants, there are too many ugly flight attendants.
The Asian airlines have the prettiest flight attendants, and they were nice dresses and are very nice to you. |
|
Taffy Saltwater
|
One l-o-n-g flight w/a bottle of Ambien & a book in case I arouse from my drug-induced semi-coma. Walk the aisles & do heel/toe stretches to prevent dvt. Flying is torture; layovers simply extend the torture. |
|
kitkat
|
One long one. I hate to have to catch another flight or sit on a hot plane while we pick up more passengers. |
|
Max
 |
One long flight and one good book, anyday. |
|
peanutz
|
It will really depends on how much time I have to travel. If I am on a holiday, I will prefer non-stop so I can have maximum time at my holiday destination. Unless the stopover is at some nice place worthwhile for me to break my travel and visit too!
For business travel, I do not mind breaking up the travel so that I spend less time in the plane. Gets too boring on long trips. |
|
dukalink6000
|
I love travel but I hate travelling. Get me there as fast as you can. |
|
LadyDragon
|
That really depends on a) how LONG the one LONG flight would be and b) which airline.
Classy airlines like Lufthansa and Cathay-Pacific... one long flight would be best... but I would definitely make it a point to get up and roam the aisles for a while to keep my legs from going numb. With other airlines, in Economy class... I would have to think about it.
For any flight that would be over 20 hours, I would probably want to break it up with at least ONE stop... where you have to at least get off your plane. But not necessarily a layover.
The reason I prefer to do it all at once is that I appreciate what time off I have... so I do not want to waste more than I possibly have to WAITING IN AN AIRPORT.
Cheers. |
|
msjudy58
 |
one non stop flight |
|
captmhunt
|
One long non stop flight is always preferable because every time you go through an airport connection, you are gampling that your plane will be on time or that the connecting flight will wait for you... and in this day and age... that's a crap shoot by any stretch of the imagination. |
|
KAYLEE
|
Well it depends. If you have a long flight to say Germany from the US then I would rather have maybe a few connections so that way you can get food and drinks and maybe using the cleaner bathrooms. I would prefer a few stops. |
|
niccyford
|
one flight, its easier by FAR. i went from the UK to dallas TX, and i had to change in chicago. i managed to only just make my connection, and my bags got lost on the way due to the change. it's a lot easier just to have a single flight, you know you dont have to bother finding the right terminal twice, and you know your bags are with you all the way.... |
|
bluepoet2007
|
That depends! Non-stop would be great in the interest of time, but layovers at least give you a chance to truly get up and stretch your legs. . . and maybe get something better to eat than the airline snack boxes. |
|
freedomnow1950
|
I HATE layovers! Flight delays can screw up your schedule, luggage can be misplaced. . .
Give me a non-stop and a good book any day. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
News
Travel Topics
Travel Forum Travel Directories
Dictionary 
Travel
Forum 
Air Travel 
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
