More curuption in india why?

Show all answers

Swapan, The Dream

More in respect to what ?
In percentage of population it is not that high compare to any other country.

See below the Corruption Perceptions Index 2006 (end)

Least corrupted cuntries -
Rank - 1
Finland, Iceland, New Zealand - 9.6 (CPI Score)

Rank - 20
Belgium, Chile, USA - 7.3

Rank - 32
Bhutan, Qatar - 6.0

Rank - 70
Brazil, China, Egypt, Ghana, India, Mexico, Peru, Saudi Arabia, Senegal - 3.3

Rank - 142
Angola, Congo, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Pakistan, Sierra, Leone, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan - 2.2

Rank - 156
Bangladesh, Chad, Congo, Sudan - 2.0

Rank - 163
Haiti - 1.8

For CPI calculation process visit - http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2006/methodology

For complete list visit - http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2006/cpi_2006__1/cpi_table

alec.

indian scene1.'daddy give me 1 rupee only then i'll go to school'. 2.son if you get good marks i'll buy you a cycle. 3.mother to her son'i'll give you a sweet if you go and buy these for home' 4.brother to his sister 'don't tell dad ,that i failed ,i'll give you all my pocket money'. 5.teacher to the student why din't you come to the class yesterday.student'not well' .teacher liar;'i saw you in the cinema hall' 6.principal,to the teacher, why where you absent yesterday? teacher,here is my leave letter from the doctor,i was sick.'he gets it by paying ten bucks for a leave letter.so it all starts within us.hope you all understand.

Maithreyi prabhu

There is more corruption in India because once a movie of gangsters and robbers are came in theatres some people go and see it some people may like it and some people may not. The people who liked it goes on seeing these types of movies and will be a gangsters and they will teach others to be like them.

Shemit

More is subjective , corruption is every where only magnitude is different. India it is there since we Indians use it to our advantage.

dulla99

One can't ask Nehru ,Indra,Rajiv the seed they had bowed yesterday tomorrow Sonia,Rahul will Cultivate.50 years r gone another 50 will go.Our generations will see the fields but won't be able to own them.

patriotisam

curuption became order of the day because the anticorruption agencies tbecame corrupt and leaving corrupt fellows by taking kickbacks and troubling sincere ,honest people by somehow booking some case intentionallyand drivig them to feed them weather they had made money lawfully or unlawfully.

Mamta

In India there no hard rules and regulations. there is whole power in the hands of bad politicians.

manidipaa

because of more corrupted people

BOA

Corruption in India and the Anti-Establishment Vote
Corruption not only has become a pervasive aspect of Indian politics but also has become an increasingly important factor in Indian elections. The extensive role of the Indian state in providing services and promoting economic development has always created the opportunity for using public resources for private benefit. As government regulation of business was extended in the 1960s and corporate donations were banned in 1969, trading economic favors for under-the-table contributions to political parties became an increasingly widespread political practice. During the 1980s and 1990s, corruption became associated with the occupants of the highest echelons of India's political system. Rajiv Gandhi's government was rocked by scandals, as was the government of P.V. Narasimha Rao. Politicians have become so closely identified with corruption in the public eye that a Times of India poll of 1,554 adults in six metropolitan cities found that 98 percent of the public is convinced that politicians and ministers are corrupt, with 85 percent observing that corruption is on the increase.

The prominence of political corruption in India in the 1990s is hardly unique to India. Other countries also have experienced corruption that has rocked their political systems. What is remarkable about India is the persistent anti-incumbent sentiment among its electorate. Since Indira's victory in her 1971 "garibi hatao " election, only one ruling party has been reelected to power in the central government. In an important sense, the exception proves the rule because the Congress (I) won reelection in 1984 in no small measure because the electorate saw in Rajiv Gandhi a "Mr. Clean" who would lead a new generation of politicians in cleansing the political system. Anti-incumbent sentiment is just as strong at the state level, where the ruling parties of all political persuasions in India's major states lost eleven of thirteen legislative assembly elections held from 1991 through spring 1995.

LOC 1995 data - corruption in India

The official site of central vigilance commission of India, Indian Government Corruption web site - http://cvc.nic.in

Transparency International (TI) is a leading international non-governmental organization addressing corruption. This includes, but is not limited to, political corruption. It is widely known for producing its annual Corruptions Perceptions Index (see below), a comparative listing of corruption worldwide.

Organisation and role
TI is organised as a group of some 100 national chapters, with an international secretariat in Berlin, Germany. Originally founded in Germany in 1993 as a not-for-profit organisation, TI is now an international non-governmental organisation, and claims to be moving towards a completely democratic organisational structure. TI says of itself:

Transparency International is the global civil society organisation leading the fight against corruption. It brings people together in a powerful worldwide coalition to end the devastating impact of corruption on men, women and children around the world. TIâ€™s mission is to create change towards a world free of corruption."
It rejects any idea of "northern superiority" regarding corruption, and is committed to exposing corruption world-wide. Since 1995 TI has issued an annual Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI); it also publishes an annual Global Corruption Report, a Global Corruption Barometer and a Bribe Payers Index.

TI does not undertake investigations on single cases of corruption or expose individual cases. It develops tools for fighting corruption and works with other civil society organisations, companies and governments to implement them. The goal of TI is to be non-partisan and to build coalitions against corruption.

TI's biggest success has been to put the topic of corruption on the world's agenda. International Institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund now view corruption as one of the main obstacles for development, whereas prior to the 1990s this topic wasn't broadly discussed. TI furthermore played a vital role in the introduction of the United Nations convention against corruption and the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention.

[edit] Corruption Perceptions Index
Main article: Corruption Perceptions Index
The CPI - besides the World Bank corruption index - is today the most commonly-used measure for corruption in scientific research. Based on many different studies, it is famed for its accuracy.[citation needed] To form this index, TI compiles surveys that ask businessmen and analysts, both in and outside the countries they are analyzing, their perceptions of how corrupt a country is. Relying on the number of actual corruption cases would not work since laws and enforcement of laws differ significantly from country to country.

The CPI is criticised for two main reasons. The first is a danger of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Country analysts might be influenced by past corruption indices and therefore not realise changes. Secondly, the use of the index values in time-series statistics is problematic due to the way it is calculated.

[edit] Bribe Payers Index
Main article: Bribe Payers Index

[edit] Competitiveness and corruption
A review of the linkages between countries' competitiveness and the incidence of corruption was initiated at a TI workshop in the International Anti-Corruption Conference in Prague, November 1998.

[edit] The German Transparency-Blog-Incident
In March 2006 TI Germany attempted to ban an article from a German Blog[1]. In this article the blogger expressed her disapproval about a friendâ€™s dismissal who used to work at TI Germany, stating accusations that TI viewed as being false. This led some German bloggers to protest against TIâ€™s alleged method of suppressing the freedom of opinion.

This reaction of the German blogosphere aroused media interest. After the blogger got some help from a German lawyer (who was also a blogger), TI Germany and the blogger came to an agreement. TI Germany never published a conclusive comment on this (a press release making some details on the monthly income of the affected employee was withdrawn very quickly[citation needed]).

Country
rank Country 2006
CPI Score
1. Finland 9.6
Iceland 9.6
New Zealand 9.6
4. Denmark 9.5
5. Singapore 9.4
6. Sweden 9.2
7. Switzerland 9.1
8. Norway 8.8
9. Australia 8.7
Netherlands 8.7
11. Austria 8.6
Luxembourg 8.6
United Kingdom 8.6
14. Canada 8.5
15. Hong Kong 8.3
16. Germany 8.0
17. Japan 7.6
18. France 7.4
Ireland 7.4
20. Belgium 7.3
Chile 7.3
USA 7.3
23. Spain 6.8
24. Barbados 6.7
Estonia 6.7
26. Macao 6.6
Portugal 6.6
28. Malta 6.4
Slovenia 6.4
Uruguay 6.4
31. United Arab Emirates 6.2
32. Bhutan 6.0
Qatar 6.0
34. Israel 5.9
Taiwan 5.9
36. Bahrain 5.7
37. Botswana 5.6
Cyprus 5.6
39. Oman 5.4
40. Jordan 5.3
41. Hungary 5.2
42. Mauritius 5.1
South Korea 5.1
44. Malaysia 5.0
45. Italy 4.9
46. Czech Republic 4.8
Kuwait 4.8
Lithuania 4.8
49. Latvia 4.7
Slovakia 4.7
51. South Africa 4.6
Tunisia 4.6
53. Dominica 4.5
54. Greece 4.4
55. Costa Rica 4.1
Namibia 4.1
57. Bulgaria 4.0
El Salvador 4.0
59. Colombia 3.9
60. Turkey 3.8
61. Jamaica 3.7
Poland 3.7
63. Lebanon 3.6
Seychelles 3.6
Thailand 3.6
66. Belize 3.5
Cuba 3.5
Grenada 3.5
69. Croatia 3.4
70. Brazil 3.3
China 3.3
Egypt 3.3
Ghana 3.3
India 3.3
Mexico 3.3
Peru 3.3
Saudi Arabia 3.3
Senegal 3.3
79. Burkina Faso 3.2
Lesotho 3.2
Moldova 3.2
Morocco 3.2
Trinidad and Tobago 3.2
84. Algeria 3.1
Madagascar 3.1
Mauritania 3.1
Panama 3.1
Romania 3.1
Sri Lanka 3.1
90. Gabon 3.0
Serbia 3.0
Suriname 3.0
93. Argentina 2.9
Armenia 2.9
Bosnia and Herzgegovina 2.9
Eritrea 2.9
Syria 2.9
Tanzania 2.9
99. Dominican Republic 2.8
Georgia 2.8
Mali 2.8
Mongolia 2.8
Mozambique 2.8
Ukraine 2.8
105. Bolivia 2.7
Iran 2.7
Libya 2.7
Macedonia 2.7
Malawi 2.7
Uganda 2.7
111. Albania 2.6
Guatemala 2.6
Kazakhstan 2.6
Laos 2.6
Nicaragua 2.6
Paraguay 2.6
Timor-Leste 2.6
Viet Nam 2.6
Yemen 2.6
Zambia 2.6
121. Benin 2.5
Gambia 2.5
Guyana 2.5
Honduras 2.5
Nepal 2.5
Phillipines 2.5
Russia 2.5
Rwanda 2.5
Swaziland 2.5
130. Azerbaijan 2.4
Burundi 2.4
Central African Republic 2.4
Ethiopia 2.4
Indonesia 2.4
Papua New Guinea 2.4
Togo 2.4
Zimbabwe 2.4
138. Cameroon 2.3
Ecuador 2.3
Niger 2.3
Venezuela 2.3
142. Angola 2.2
Congo, Republic 2.2
Kenya 2.2
Kyrgyzstan 2.2
Nigeria 2.2
Pakistan 2.2
Sierra Leone 2.2
Tajikistan 2.2
Turkmenistan 2.2
151. Belarus 2.1
Cambodia 2.1
CÃ´te dÂ´Ivoire 2.1
Equatorial Guinea 2.1
Uzbekistan 2.1
156. Bangladesh 2.0
Chad 2.0
Congo, Democratic Republic 2.0
Sudan 2.0
160. Guinea 1.9
Iraq 1.9
Myanmar 1.9
163. Haiti 1.8

durga v

I agree with Swapan-......

Enter Your Message or Comment

User Name:
User Email:
Post a comment: