Woodbridge
 |
Absolutely, YES. They should be kept alive, 90% burns and all, and absolutely prevented from killing themselves. Also, they should be treated in a standard NHS hospital, so they get a good dose of MRSA as well. |
|
sonfai81
|
Yes, especially the guy who set himself alight. They want to die so the best punishment is to make them live with their burns as a permanent reminder of what they tried to do to innocent people. |
|
Rad
 |
a quick death is too good for the scum and they may have useful info about other plots
i used to think this but you have to look at the bigger picture x |
|
Mojo Risin
 |
No. They should be sent to the city incinerator and finish the job they started with all the other garbage |
|
mata123
 |
NO |
|
Mrs G
|
No - lets drop them off in George Square -- and stick Bin Laden Sandwich Boards around their necks - place them in Orange shell suits and chain them to a lamp post - and if they want to be deep fried - then let the public have free shots at a flame thrower.. |
|
Rachel A
 |
No offcourse not! wasting the doctors time and wasting out money! |
|
amanda c
 |
Just rub some alcohol and menthol on the burns to stop infection. |
|
Fiona I
|
We should give him the minimum care he needs. Who are we to play God? That makes us just like them!
Beside, i doubt he's getting a lot of TLC
Also, if we left him to die he would be seen as a martyr, dying at the hands of the "evil" westerners. This way he has to live with what he's tried to do (and he suffers too) |
|
kiltgirl
|
Come on now. Many of the plotters were medical doctors and everyone is wondering how they could possibly be in a healing profession and still want to kill people. So why is it okay for "us" to do the same thing? We have to be better than the people who are trying to kill us, and not stoop to their level! |
|
LYNNSGARETHS
|
they should have let them burn,but they didnt so i hope they suffer. |
|
Gerald J
|
Absolutely yes, they need to let them heal and get better, then they can torture them to get information from them. |
|
martin_alcorn
|
most certainly not, unfortunetly there's not really much way round it without being totally immoral (despite what the thugs done) |
|
Beastie
 |
You don't keep them alive because they deserve it, you keep them alive so they can answer questions.
Dead terrorists are no great loss to the world, but unless you're a psychic medium you can't get any answers out of a dead bloke. |
|
fernmaid
|
No but they'll do it anyway! |
|
MD
|
I think they should have tossed a pork chop on him and watched it cook...
I'm in the US but have family in Glascow, coalburn and Lanarkshire....The terrorists have *&^%ed up now. Ya dont bomb Scotland
WALLACE!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
fitzeireann
|
Scum! Scum! Scum! They should have never put the flames out on the guy that was on fire! That guy is going to hell anyway....they should have let him burn alive! |
|
centralvac
|
It's a difficult one, the fact of the matter is that we live in a civilised society and therefore do not play God, I'd let the bastards burn but how would they be of any use to us if they were dead, maybe they can answer questions and help the government get to the root of the problem.
You could debate it all day but the fact of the matter is that we wont kill them, it'll never happen - same as we would all love to force all Asians out of the UK, we can't, most of them are British but they seem to forget it in the name of Alla, traitorous bastards.
One thing I do know is that they'll all get theirs, they've not banked on GLASGOW, we wont be ******* with. |
|
peppy
|
I don't imagine they are getting too much tender loving care (TLC) other than the burns being looked after. I thought they should rot in hell, but on the other hand they hopefully get some important information out of them. We live in a sick world. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Travel
Forum 
United Kingdom 
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
