Paco
 |
I like that phrase "wind up merchant".
Since London is the most common destination for Americans making a trans-oceanic flight, the first thing we do is to comment on the little cars, the refrigerators, and the small hotel rooms and houses. I thought the same thing when I was 18.
Now that I'm older I realize that the city of Tokyo with almost 30 million people probably uses less energy than the city of Houston with 2 million. So many Americans have never been on a train in their lives. Since the late 1970's as Europe began building their network of intercity high speed rail, we deregulated our airlines to the point that we have no other options now. I know the distances are greater, but we frequently get on a plane to go 300 miles. We are faced with an increasing problem of paying for our daily lives.
Spain came into the EU in 1986 and they were selling tickets on their first high speed rail in 1992. California formed the committee to design a high speed rail from Los Angeles to San Francisco 12 years ago, and they have never put the bill on the ballot? Yet the airports are completely overloaded largely because of so many people flying the short haul inter-california distances. |
|
M
|
I feel like being a bit snarky tonight - it's because unlike here in the States people don't have rear ends more than two ax-handles wide and therefore don't require the massive cargo size accomadations we do. At least one certainly never hears of people being cut out of their tiny houses when they've become too fat to, and yet, oddly we hear of people being cut out of their big houses here. Hmmm ...
Yes, this is utter snark and cheekiness. :P |
|
Ken B
|
Following on from the previous answer, if your population density was the same as ours, your population would be 2.5 billion - does that answer your question?
If it does not then i would say you are incapable of rational thought. |
|
sarch_uk
|
Because we are a small, but beautifully formed island...and you seem to be wanting to cause an argument. We could ask why everything in the States is so large...including your lunatic asylums! |
|
Sebastian
|
so that all the little hobbits don't feel left out
btw, this guy is a wind up merchant, i suggest everyone just ignores him, he constantly posts questions to try and get a reaction |
|
GorGeous_Girl
|
because the houses and the cars we have here are big enough for us. a family of 4 easily and comfortably live ina 3 bed here in england whereas in america EVERYONE needs massive houses... massive food.... massive everything
plus if each one of us had to have bigger cars and bigger houses we would be using much more fuel / gast to heat the houses and run the cars and pollute the world, and i think america is already doing a pretty good job of it so no need for england to join too yeah !
sorry to be rude but you asked for it ! |
|
carina
|
no wonder the Americans consume a disproportionately huge amount of the world's resources |
|
lladnylnavillus
 |
Maybe it's the weather. Smaller houses are much easier to keep warmer during the long, cold winters. |
|
froggequene
|
I agree with Seb, this kid has asked several questions in a similar vein that should be answered with silence. |
|
Cameron
 |
because land is very expensive here |
|
Lorraine W
|
paco, i like your answer.
and for everyone else....this question is typical of what gives americans a bad name.... and he knows it...
i do find however that when i go to really old houses such as in York, the ceiling heights are low and the doorways are too,
i guess way back then people were shorter. but then i'm only 5'1" !!! |
|
wannabe93
|
well, you don't exactley need a big house do you! And besides you have more space to put your houses, we only have a small island |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Travel
Forum 
United Kingdom 
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
