Rossonero NorCal SFECU
|
SF definitely. The plusses are the restaurants, the neighborhoods, the natural beauty of the city (hills, bay/ocean), it's full of surprises.... the negatives are it's unbelievably expensive and usually gets little sunshine. Also the nut city council, but I'll leave politics out.
LA does have better weather and beaches, I'll give them that, plus Tommy's. But it's also a bit expensive (not as bad as SF) and kind of a generic place with strip malls galore. I don't hate LA as many in SF do, but I definitely prefer living up here. |
|
shaniqua l
 |
The best place to live at is LA |
|
~lil' ghetto azn kid~
 |
LA! i've lived there all my life! =D |
|
exclusiveross
|
LA |
|
happy
|
both are tempting, but the air pollution around LA bothers me more.
if you can live around SF (but outside) the air is very nice. |
|
jaijay15
|
la because the weather is great and there's a ton to see and do. also the shopping, food, and beaches are the best the west coast offers. plus if you're young, the night life is incredible. |
|
stokes4show
|
La of course .. bcause it has more stuff going on ..and la is warmer |
|
lizzieo@sbcglobal.net
|
LA :] |
|
laa dee da
 |
the bay area, its near everything, the beach to get away from the heat, mountains for snowboarding/skiing, lake tahoe, napa valley, ect. It gets hot though. I live in the east bay in Dublin and it was 113 here yesterday! ack! |
|
mikkey s
|
NYC HAHAHAHAH F/CK THE WEST COAST................. |
|
scantron
|
S. F. fo' sho! |
|
robert r
 |
San Francisco has less people, less violence, less smog, 100 times better public transit, better restaurants and cafes. SF |
|
SusanS, Incognito
|
Neither, come East. You will be in the ocean soon. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Travel
Forum 
United States 
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
